Which SCI/SSCI journals in 2025 CAS Zone 2 review fastest?
2025 CAS Zone 2 SCI/SSCI Journal Review-time Rankings
Which SCI/SSCI journals in 2025 CAS Zone 2 review fastest? As of 2026-10-04, 1462 journals with at least 5 complete samples are ranked by average review time with paper-level evidence links.
Data updated:
Direct Answer
As of 2026-10-04, among journals with at least 5 complete review records, the top five are Social Semiotics (average 9 days, median 5.5 days, 10 samples)、Gels (average 26.3 days, median 28 days, 15 samples)、mBio (average 26.8 days, median 14 days, 5 samples)、JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY (average 29.3 days, median 3.5 days, 10 samples)、RESPIROLOGY (average 31.1 days, median 18.5 days, 18 samples). Rankings are ordered by average review time.
Evidence-backed Ranking
Average Review Time: Fastest to Slowest
1507 journals in category · 1462 eligible · Showing top 20
Which SCI/SSCI journals in 2025 CAS Zone 2 review fastest?
As of 2026-10-04, among journals with at least 5 complete review records, the top five are Social Semiotics (average 9 days, median 5.5 days, 10 samples)、Gels (average 26.3 days, median 28 days, 15 samples)、mBio (average 26.8 days, median 14 days, 5 samples)、JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY (average 29.3 days, median 3.5 days, 10 samples)、RESPIROLOGY (average 31.1 days, median 18.5 days, 18 samples). Rankings are ordered by average review time.
How many journals does this ranking cover?
This category contains 1507 target journals; 1462 meet the public ranking threshold of at least 5 complete received/accepted date records.
How are review days calculated?
Review days equal the acceptance date minus the received date; publication dates are not used as substitutes. Each journal page retains paper, DOI, PDF, and publisher-page links for verification.
Where do the CAS categories in the ranking come from?
The 2025 CAS field from the 2026 Emerging Journal master list is used first. The separate 2025 CAS source table fills gaps only when the master value is empty; missing values remain empty when both sources lack data.