Paper Review Records
All Paper Review Records
15 valid samples · Newest publication first
Review days = acceptance date − received date. PDF, DOI, and publisher-page sources are retained.
181
days
Testing for alphabetical bias in the c-score: Implications for evaluating scientific excellence
AuthorsCiriaco Andrea D’Angelo
AffiliationsUniversity of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Dept of Engineering and Management, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
91
days
Biblioshiny and the SAAS Workflow: An integrated framework for transparent and reproducible science mapping. A demonstration through the replication of a study
AuthorsMassimo Aria; Corrado Cuccurullo; Luca D’Aniello; Maria Spano
AffiliationsDepartment of Economics and Statistics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; K-Synth academic Spinoff, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Department of Economics and Management, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Capua, Italy
151
days
“What cannot be said cannot be measured”: On the philosophical foundations and limits of bibliometrics
AuthorsJuan Gorraiz
AffiliationsUniversity of Vienna, Vienna University Library, Wien, Austria
334
days
Author team size as a structural pathway of citation impact: A transformation-robust bibliometric analysis
AuthorsShlomit Hadad; Daphne R. Raban; Noa Aharony
AffiliationsDepartment of Social Sciences; Department of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, Israel; School of Business Administration, University of Haifa, Israel; Department of Information Science, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
238
days
Measuring the effect of structural differences between Web of Science and Scopus on research impact assessment
AuthorsSándor Soós; Anna Kiss; Zsófia Viktória Vida
AffiliationsDepartment of Science Policy and Scientometrics, Library and Information Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary; Faculty of Education and Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary; Pro-Sharp Research and Innovation Centre, Budapest, Hungary
Expert Matching · Case Demo
Turn Your Submission Goalsinto a Verifiable Journal Plan
Share your field, deadline, and author profile. CrushSCI uses real review records to suggest a title direction, shortlist journals, and estimate timelines.
Client
I work in environmental engineering and need an SCI paper published within three months. I have no grant funding or prominent co-author. Which journals could I target?
CrushSCI
Yes. We will first screen for feasibility against the 90-day deadline, then identify comparable papers without grant support or prominent co-authors. The final shortlist will prioritize research quality and journal scope.
- Suggested title
- Machine Learning and Life-Cycle Assessment for Predicting and Optimizing Carbon Emissions in Urban Wastewater Treatment
- Database shortlist
- Environmental Technology & Innovation
SampleLatest 5 valid paper samples from 2026
Average review96.4 days
Median77 days