医学
Paper Review Records
全部论文审稿周期
15 篇有效样本 · 按发表日期由新到旧排列
审稿天数=录用日期-收稿日期;保留 PDF/DOI/网页源链接
Implementation of an ePRO-based system supporting treatment readiness assessments in lung cancer care: a mixed-methods study
作者Lasse Lybecker Scheel-Hincke; Johanne Dam Lyhne; Sanne Skovbjerg; Anne Skov Villadsen; Rasmus Blechingberg Friis; Mette Bøg Horup; Anne Mette Ølholm
作者单位1. CIMT - Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 2. Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 3. Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Vejle, Denmark; 4. Quality and Patient Safety, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Vejle, Denmark; 5. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Psychometric evaluation of separate anxiety and depression item banks - potential supplements to the EORTC CAT Core
作者Morten Aa. Petersen; Hugo Vachon; Neil K. Aaronson; Johannes M. Giesinger; Bernhard Holzner; Monika Sztankay; Mogens Groenvold
作者单位1. Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Copenhagen NV, Denmark; 2. Quality of Life Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; 3. Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4. Health Outcomes Research Unit, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; 5. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Differences in quality of life between early onset colorectal cancer patients compared to older patients: a qualitative study
作者Julie Tucker; Brooke Turner; April Harrison; Rebecca Chamberlain; Devinder Raju; Elizabeth Murphy; Van M. T. Hoang
作者单位1. Division of Surgical Specialties and Anaesthetics, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia; 2. University South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; 3. Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia; 4. Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, Australia
Measuring satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices
作者Callie E. Tyner; Aaron J. Boulton; Jerry Slotkin; Pamela A. Kisala; Ross Zafonte; W. Lee Childers; Christopher L. Dearth; Josef Butkus; David S. Tulsky
作者单位1. Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark, USA; 2. Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA; 3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, USA; 4. Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Antonio, USA; 5. Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA; 6. Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, USA; 7. Departments of Physical Therapy and Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, USA
A multidimensional item response theory analysis of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: measurement precision, differential item functioning, and potential for item reduction
作者Henry U. Michael; Todd A. Wilson; Danielle A. Southern; Oluwagbohunmi A. Awosoga; Michelle M. Graham; Stephen B. Wilton; Matthew T. James; Lisa M. Lix; Tolulope T. Sajobi
作者单位1. Department of Community Health Sciences, O’Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; 2. Center for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada; 4. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 5. Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; 6. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; 7. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Expert Matching · Case Demo
把投稿要求,转成可验证的期刊方案
说清专业、时限和作者背景,CrushSCI 结合真实审稿样本,给出拟题方向、期刊初筛与周期判断。