Paper Review Records
All Paper Review Records
10 valid samples · Newest publication first
Review days = acceptance date − received date. PDF, DOI, and publisher-page sources are retained.
195
days
Paediatric Preference Prediction: the Future of Decision-Making for Children?
AuthorsDominic James Clifford Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu; Brian Earp
Affiliations1. Uehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; 2. Newborn Care, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; 3. Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
116
days
A Scoping Review of Ethical Considerations in the Use of AI for Bereavement-related Grief Support
AuthorsYun Ting Ong; Michael Dunn; G. Owen Schaefer
Affiliations1. Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
351
days
Beyond Legality: Students’ Moral Attitudes Toward Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Cognitive Enhancement
AuthorsMegan Hurford; Alexia Dunham; Sineha Selvaratnam; Andrew K Martin
Affiliations1. School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom; 2. Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, United Kingdom
130
days
When Minds Merge: Neural Telepathy, Neurorights, and the Limits of Voluntary Privacy Waiver
Authorsinigo de miguel beriain; Anibal M. Astobiza; Francesca Tassinari; Mercedes López de la Peña de Pablo
Affiliations1. Department of public law, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain; 2. Ikerbasque, Bilbao, Spain; 3. University of Granada, Granada, Spain
288
days
Digital Life Models and Transformative Choices: Could AI Simulations of Individual Minds (AI SIMs) Help us Make Important Life Decisions More Rationally and Authentically?
AuthorsChristopher Register; Sebastian Porsdam Mann; Cristina Voinea; Julian Koplin; Julian Savulescu; Brian D. Earp
Affiliations1. Uehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; 2. Center for Advanced Studies in Bioscience Innovation Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3. Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 4. Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
174
days
Resident-to-resident Aggression in Long-term Aged Care and Beneficence-based Justification for Psychotropic Use
AuthorsHojjat Soofi
Affiliations1. Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
239
days
What is It Like to Communicate While Locked-In? First-person Perspectives On Communication and Implications for Design of Brain-Computer Interfaces
AuthorsB. van Balen; J. van Grunsven; W. A. IJsselsteijn; N. F. Ramsey; Mariska J. Vansteensel
Affiliations1. UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; 2. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands; 3. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands; 4. Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
9
days
How Should We Think About Study Drugs? From Efficacy to Equality
AuthorsNicholas G. Evans; Skylar Bird
Affiliations1. Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, United States; 2. University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, United States
149
days
Childhood Neurotechnology and Developmental Cognitive Sovereignty in the Global Cognitive Economy
AuthorsGeorge Chingarande
Affiliations1. Department of Medical Ethics and Law, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
348
days
Regulating Next-Generation Implantable Brain-Computer Interfaces: Recommendations for Ethical Development and Implementation
AuthorsRenée A. Sirbu; Jessica Morley; Tyler Schroder; Raghavendra Pradyumna Pothukuchi; Muhammed Ugur; Abhishek Bhattacharjee; Luciano Floridi
Affiliations1. Yale Digital Ethics Center, Yale University, New Haven, USA; 2. Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, USA; 3. Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Expert Matching · Case Demo
Turn Your Submission Goalsinto a Verifiable Journal Plan
Share your field, deadline, and author profile. CrushSCI uses real review records to suggest a title direction, shortlist journals, and estimate timelines.
Client
I work in environmental engineering and need an SCI paper published within three months. I have no grant funding or prominent co-author. Which journals could I target?
CrushSCI
Yes. We will first screen for feasibility against the 90-day deadline, then identify comparable papers without grant support or prominent co-authors. The final shortlist will prioritize research quality and journal scope.
- Suggested title
- Machine Learning and Life-Cycle Assessment for Predicting and Optimizing Carbon Emissions in Urban Wastewater Treatment
- Database shortlist
- Environmental Technology & Innovation
SampleLatest 5 valid paper samples from 2026
Average review96.4 days
Median77 days