Paper Review Records
全部论文审稿周期
17 篇有效样本 · 按发表日期由新到旧排列
审稿天数=录用日期-收稿日期;保留 PDF/DOI/网页源链接
169
天
Language assessment in bi/multilingual aphasia: a scoping review of trends and challenges
作者
Elyssa V. Favis; Franziska Newman; Liz Dennett; Kathleen Mellahn; Samantha Siyambalapitiya; Esther S. Kim; Tanya Dash展开收起
作者单位
1. University of Alberta; 2. Caboolture Hospital; 3. La Trobe University; 4. Bond University展开收起
337
天
Aphasia treatment research: a decision-making tool to guide the design of phased trials from the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (CATs) trials for aphasia panel
作者
Erin Godecke; Emily Brogan; Rebecca Palmer; Marian C. Brady; Frank Becker; Caterina Breitenstein; Sonia Brownsett; Julius Fridriksson; Katerina Hilari; Argye E. Hillis; Paola Marangolo; Miranda L. Rose; Shirley Thomas; Donna C. Tippett; Julie Bernhardt; Kathryn S. Hayward展开收起
作者单位
1. Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science; 2. Edith Cowan University & Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital; 3. La Trobe University; 4. Curtin University & Fiona Stanley and Fremantle Health Service Group; 5. The University of Sheffield; 6. Glasgow Caledonian University; 7. Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway; 8. University of Oslo; 9. Department of Neurology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; 10. The University of Queensland; 11. University of South Carolina; 12. University of London; 13. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; 14. Department of Humanities, University Federico II, Naples, Italy; 15. University of Nottingham; 16. Stroke Theme, the Florey, University of Melbourne; 17. University of Melbourne展开收起
174
天
Development and validity of the Health Professionals and Aphasia Questionnaire for evaluating communication partner training outcomes
作者
Iben Christensen; Lise Randrup Jensen; Anne Mølgaard Brøndum; Regina Fromsejer Heiberg; Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff; Jytte Isaksen展开收起
作者单位
1. University of Copenhagen; 2. University of Southern Denmark; 3. ViSP Kommunikationscenter; 4. Rigshospitalet展开收起
186
天
169
天
Expert Matching · Case Demo
把投稿要求,转成可验证的期刊方案
说清专业、时限和作者背景,CrushSCI 结合真实审稿样本,给出拟题方向、期刊初筛与周期判断。
